English Normans by 1203 they were changing Illustration by Glen McBeth |
History is an account, mostly false, of
events, mostly unimportant, which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves,
and soldiers, mostly fools. ~ Ambrose Bierce
I am writing a historical MG novel.
The setting has been easiest to piece together because there are many
sources full of the details -as long as what I want to know is what the great
men of the day were doing.
Even in 1203, most people were getting on with the basics -
survival. I looked for the wonder, and the joy, in living in those
times: food, weaponry, warmth and friendships.
During research for one of my secondary characters, I found a person
who, if he hadn't been murdered, possibly at the hands of the king, would have
changed British history. I want to thread him into my tale. I'm having a
problem. I want to use him but - if he'd lived - why wouldn't he have
asserted his claim to the throne when he was old enough?
IS THERE A STRONG ENOUGH REASON FOR SOMEONE TO TURN THEIR BACK ON THEIR
DESTINY?
Thats an awesome premise Elaine. I think you can prove it in the MC motivations. Some people believe there are more than one timeline (destiny) for a person. This is how alternate universe's are conceived.
ReplyDelete........dhole
Hi Donna
ReplyDeleteThank you. I'm afraid I might be too much the "history graduate" to take a semi proven fact and run with it ;)