Thursday 17 January 2013

HEMMED IN BY HISTORICAL FACT

English Normans
by 1203 they were changing
Illustration by Glen McBeth
History is an account, mostly false, of events, mostly unimportant, which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers, mostly fools. ~ Ambrose Bierce

I am writing a historical MG novel.

The setting has been easiest to piece together because there are many sources full of the details -as long as what I want to know is what the great men of the day were doing.

Even in 1203, most people were getting on with the basics - survival. I looked for the wonder, and the joy, in living in those times: food, weaponry, warmth and friendships.

During research for one of my secondary characters, I found a person who, if he hadn't been murdered, possibly at the hands of the king, would have changed British history. I want to thread him into my tale. I'm having a problem. I want to use him but - if he'd lived - why wouldn't he have asserted his claim to the throne when he was old enough?

IS THERE A STRONG ENOUGH REASON FOR SOMEONE TO TURN THEIR BACK ON THEIR DESTINY? 

2 comments:

  1. Thats an awesome premise Elaine. I think you can prove it in the MC motivations. Some people believe there are more than one timeline (destiny) for a person. This is how alternate universe's are conceived.

    ........dhole

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Donna
    Thank you. I'm afraid I might be too much the "history graduate" to take a semi proven fact and run with it ;)

    ReplyDelete